altaerif bial'iibham eind almuhdithin

  • kaylan muhamad fatih altalbany University of Tikrit College of Education for Humanities
  • miqdad khazeal ahmdalezawy University of Tikrit College of Education for Humanities

Abstract

Thank God I have come to my conclusion through my research on the vagueness in Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal'sMusnad's the first part to the results that I’m going to state through the following points:


                                                                                                                                                                                


1 - vagueness in narrating make them of the type of return, which is one of the causes of weakness, because the narrator is unknown of what we do not know about his fairness and control. the narration remainsweak unless the vagueness is revealed or strengthened by another narration and this opinion of the public of religion scientists.


2 - There are some types of vagueness where it does not harm the narration and do not weaken, which is the vagueness of the Companions on the opinion of the publics (the public of religion scientists), and the heads of the group, and vagueness inthe basic narration.


3 - Not to accept thenarration of the amendment on the vagueness unless it is named, and case is known by the followers of the criticizism and modification, and this is based on the opinion of the publics.


4 - The interest of religion scientists a lot of knowledge of vagueness and detection, especially the vagueness in the support, so the religion scientists in ancient and modern, and the reason is that the vagueness affects the acceptance of the narration and its response.


5 - Through my reading I did not find a book of modern books only signed by the vagueness, whether of the types of vagueness-return, or other types that do not harm the narration.


6 - The rule of attribution in which the vagueness is connected is vague, and this is the opinion of the public.


7 - do not judge the Hadith, which is based on the principle of weakness, unless the search to find, if we do not find them after inspection  then we can judge the narration weakness and interruption, or ignorance of the narrator.


8 - The case of the anonymous narrator is not revealed unless it comes from another way, either from the narrator who narrated the hadeeth, or from another narrator, and the ambiguity is also revealed if the pronunciation of the vagueness is known by the scholars of the biography and translations.


9 - If the narration remains on the vagueness then be of the types of the weak and strengthen others if it came other ways to force it and support it to the degree of good support for others.


10 - There are a number of Hadiths cannot reveal the vagueness of the Support, and the inability of the major critics to explore.


11 - The need to study the vague evidence to find out what strengthens the narration to increase the degree of evidence in the truthiness and weakness

Published
Mar 22, 2019
How to Cite
FATIH ALTALBANY, kaylan muhamad; KHAZEAL AHMDALEZAWY, miqdad. altaerif bial'iibham eind almuhdithin. Journal of Tikrit university for humanities - مجلة جامعة تكريت للعلوم الانسانية, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 9, p. 24-48, mar. 2019. ISSN 1817-6798. Available at: <https://jtuh.tu.edu.iq/index.php/hum/article/view/48>. Date accessed: 19 may 2024.